A proposal has been submitted by Councillor Lynn Riley of Frodsham to Cheshire West and Chester Highway Agency to alter traffic flow at the Clifton Road T junction on the A 56 by the swing bridge. The proposal calls for all traffic heading towards Sutton Weaver and northward on the A 56 to turn left at the above junction which has originally been controlled by traffic lights and travel to the motorway roundabout and double back to the T junction taking the left turn northward. Proposal is shown below. The proposal states that road users going northwards towards Sutton Weaver turn left at the junction, travel westerly along Clifton Road to the motorway roundabout, negotiate the roundabout, double back on themselves and travel along easterly to the A 557 Clifton back to the A 56 junction and turn left on the A 56. This will increase the journey by a mile (1.6 km).

There was no consultation held with regards to this with the people affected. A meeting was convened two days before the closing date for objections, and by the tone of the meeting it felt that it was solely an information sharing meeting and was unlikely to affect the proposal.
Although the meeting was held at short notice, it was well attended. There were more objectors than the meeting hall could accommodate.
There is another proposal by a private development company, the Stepping Stones Group on land the company owns adjacent to Clifton Road and the A 56. A photographic representation is shown below. The meeting was informed at the start, however, that this proposal was not on the agenda and was not for discussion at this meeting. This proposal is conditional upon the council granting development permits for further developments locally or exchange of suitable development land.

There may also be another cheaper and easier solution. The junction is wide enough to accommodate a roundabout similar in size to the one at the junction of the A 56 Warrington Road and A 533 Northwich Road. There is, also, sufficient land beside the canal opposite Stepping Stones land to slightly widen the junction if necessary. I have seen such work being carried out in a town in Burgundy in France, and the building work was completed from start to finish in one week. This is an ideal solution and it can be done by temporarily using the current northward bound land as the southerly and westerly lane and traffic to Sutton Weaver using Halton Station Road. This can be done whilst the temporary remains in place. It must be acknowledged that this will cause inconvenience to residents of Halton Station Road for a very short time. It should also be made clear to HGV drivers exiting the motorway and going to the Whitehouse Industrial Estate that they must use the appropriate expressways and not Halton Station Road. The map below shows the Junction with a small cross.

The Riley/Dawson proposal has one and only one advantage. It creates a free traffic flow for the residents of Frodsham to and from the motorway. However, it has several disadvantages including the inconvenience that this will cause to road users travelling northwards from Frodsham.
- Road users will have to travel a whole extra mile (1.6 km).
- There will be an increase in pollution and pollutants in a time when we are trying to reduce these.
- I fear for our cyclists. They will not only have to travel an extra mile (1.6 km) but will have to compete with all other traffic including HGVs (both left and right hand driven), negotiate a very busy motorway junction, particularly, having to turn right to double back on themselves. This is asking for fatal road accidents and putting lives at risk.
- It is going to add additional journey time to rescue services coming from the Frodsham direction, specially, the Fire Service and the police.
- It is going to increase traffic flow through Halton Station Road by Frodsham Traffic going to Runcorn Shopping Centre and by a majority of Runcorn traffic heading from the Frodsham direction to Runcorn. This will cause a permanent inconvenience and disruption for Halton Road residents. Additionally, Halton Road is not suitable for heavy traffic.
- Closure of junction 12 or 14 of the M 56 motorway or heavy traffic on the said motorway will also have an impact on the A 56 traffic causing further disruptions. This a regular and recurrent problem now, and it is going to get worse.
- Many road users presently avoid using the A 56 because of the temporary traffic changes. Once the work is completed and the road reopens, normal traffic will resume using that route and it will be "murder" turning right at that junction.
None of the above issues appear to have been taken into consideration. In my opinion, it is the most absurd proposal ever.
Unfortunately, it is highly unlikely that objections and proposals other than the one proposed by Councillor Lynn Riley and backed by Councillor Dawson will be adopted. The information given at the meeting also seem to suggest that Councillor Lynn Riley has the final say as the ultimate decision maker in her role within the Cheshire West and Chester Council. Cheshire West and Chester Council does not appear to have considered the serious conflict of interest in this matter with Councillor Riley being the proposer and decision maker for this permanent Traffic Regulation Order.
Good Bye and God bless the poor cyclists and stressed motorists
Knight Owl